
Research Project.
Thomas Iles
Interior Architecture & Design Year 4.
N0362462
Primary Research:
Intro:
On this page I will accumulate the questionnaires from visiting my case studies, I aim to compare the results from each visit to see any common themes or anomalies. I will also talk to professionals or people associated closely with a pier, to attempt to gain a better understanding of what direction the British Pier is heading.
My Photo's from Site Visits:




Observations:
- What is the age group of people visiting the pier? (120 people)

- Pleasure or Commercial Pier?
- What facilities does the pier have?


Questionnaire:
- What is your age?

- Do you think the pier is accommodating to all age groups?

- Which age groups use the pier most?

-Are you local to the town, or a visitor?

- What is your main reason for visiting the pier?

- Do you feel the pier is at the heart of the community?

- Do you feel the pier is a central part of the town’s heritage?

- Do you think that the pier attracts tourists/visitors to the town?

Interviews:
Interview 1:
For me to understand reasons behind the redevelopment and change at Hastings Pier, I approached dRMM architects in an attempt to find out how they approached the project and what inspired them to make decisions they made. I spoke to a designer called Fridah:
- Why did you decide to take up the design challenge of redeveloping Hastings Pier/ what drew you to this particular project?
F: We decided to pitch for the project because there is a really brilliant heritage to the pier and local area. The project offered an opportunity to explore and try to work on something that was different to other piers around. We were drawn by the fact we could help bring a community together with the project.
- When considering the initial design proposals, did you consult/ liaise with the community to take into account their opinion?
F: Our approach was simple: to develop the project with the people of Hastings through a series of participation events and workshops. We discovered a community that was individualistic and eclectic but with a proud shared identity embodied in the pier.
- Does this feel like a community project, have you found locals to be proactive in giving their opinion/help/donations?
F: Yes, very much so. In particular with the help of Hastings Pier charity, many people not just from the local community but even internationally have donated in the ‘adopt a plank ‘scheme. We have held many focus groups to gain an understanding of opinion.
- Were there any piers you looked to, to inspire the design or future function of Hastings pier?
F: We did look at some piers outside the UK, especially from Holland and Japan to get a different perspective to what we are used to in the UK. We also looked deeply into the history of British piers and those especially around the south coast.
- What made you decide to redesign Hastings Pier in a contemporary manner/ are there any elements of the pier which acknowledge its design history or keep its original heritage?
F: With the fire destroying so much of the previous structure on the pier, we looked to come up with a really fresh take on the pier to make it a more popular attraction in today’s market. We kept the surviving pavilion at the landward end – renovating it into a modern restaurant and opening it up to have a better connection with the sea.
- In your opinion do you think the redevelopment of piers should all be designed with the future in mind, or would you regard maintaining the heritage of piers a fundamental factor?
F: While working on Hastings Pier, the fundamental factor we thought about was the heritage, knowing the history of the pier and reasons for its popularity in the past. Then we used these as guidelines and took a modern design approach to get to our proposal. The project may look contemporary, but the way in which you interact with architecture and the sea reflects the history.
- Form or function, which has been the dominant factor of this redevelopment?
F: Function, our approach was to have a function that would attract a wide range of people to the pier in the future, whist the form is pretty simple, to keep the connection with the sea.
- The recent fire damage which destroyed part of Eastbourne Pier, during the summer of 2014 has brought about the reconstruction of the pier. What would be your design approach for Eastbourne pier, would you maintain its heritage or design for the future?
F: The fire is a great shame but of course I think now there is opportunity to develop the pier in a different way, just like we’ve done at Hastings. The heritage is of course very important but designing to meet current and future demands is the most important approach to think about.
Analysis:
The interview shows:
- The history/heritage of the pier is a fundamental factor in the redesign.
- Change and a modern concept is important.
- It may be interesting to mix the tradition style with a more contemporary outlook.
- Make sure to develop the connection with the sea and town, community.
Interview 2:
I wanted to speak to the owners of Hasting Pier, The Hastings Pier Charity to see what they were looking for when the competition was won, and how they have been involved in the redevelopment. It will be interesting to see if they imagined a contemporary pier or is the architects dictated this.
- What made you decide to choose DRMM Architects as the designers for Hastings pier?
S: We chose to work with dRMM because they have a really good portfolio of heritage work. The proposal they submitted for the competition and pitch showed they wanted to work closely with us and the community through the design process, while still understanding we wanted a new pier for the future.
- Have you and the community felt an integral part of the redevelopment process?
S: Yes, we of course have been very involved – but the community also, focus groups and workshops have been held for the community to have their input.
- Was it a joint decision (both community and architects) to approach the redevelopment with a contemporary mind, looking to the future to concentrate on enhancing the primary function?
S: Yes, we always knew that the pier needed to move forward to ensure it becomes profitable once more and more importantly a popular place for people to visit again in Hastings.
- Will there be any elements of the pier which acknowledge its design history or keep its original heritage?
S: The existing pavilion wasn’t badly damaged by the fire in 2010 and is currently being brought back to its previous state, as a new affordable restaurant.
- Have you been surprised or underwhelmed with the support and interest from the community during the redevelopment?
S: I haven’t been surprised but very happy with the amount of support we have recieved. I think that the community has always felt strongly about the pier, even before we had the money granted to redevelop it.
- What are your aspirations and hopes for the future of Hastings pier- would you like to see an increase in tourist attraction, thus bringing an increase in revenue to the town?
S: The fundamental factor is restoring the pier as it has such history and is a fundamental part of our town. Making revenue is important so that in the future we don’t let the pier become unsafe and derelict once more.
Analysis:
The interview shows:
- The community want positive change.
- Community spirit, togetherness.
- All round envolvement in the project.
Interview 3:
Eastbourne Pier is privately owned, I want to get the view of the council on how the fire has effected the town, and also to see how they think the redevelopment should be approached.
-What are you views on the recent fire destroying part of Eastbourne pier?
The fire was very sad for the town, the pier is an integral part of our community and to see one of the oldest remaining building burn down was a real tragedy. To be more positive, the aftermath has brought the community together to ensure the pier is reopened.
-In your opinion, has local tourism to the town of Eastbourne been affected?
Local businesses suffered the most as they rely so much on visitors to the town, especially the smaller ones associated with the pier. Unfortunately the fire was just before our busiest season of the year, and only a week before Eastbourne Airbourne, which over the past few years has become a major event for the town and pier.
-Would you say the pier was a main tourist attraction- and to which age demographic?
Many tourists visit Eastbourne for the pier, it is part of our brilliant coastline and heritage so people coming to visit the town will take time to see the piers attractions. The pier is a special attraction which has something for everyone, which is why it has been so successful for so long.
-Do you think the pier should look to other examples like Hastings for ideas about the development and moving forward, or do you think its best the pier is redeveloped with similar style and function in mind?
Hastings is very interesting and I’m looking forward to seeing the pier when the project is finished. Moving forward is important to make sure the pier is still popular with today’s trends of course, looking at other projects can be a help. But the fire at Hastings caused a large amount more damage so the projects are a little different. Likewise in Brighton is the i360 so other towns are taking a step forward around us.
Analysis:
The interview shows:
- There is a sense of loss around Eastbourne.
- Small local businesses have been the worst effected by the fire.
- The project needs to move the town forward.